House Passes food-labeling bill

House passes food-labeling bill
BY BILL LAMBRECHT
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

WASHINGTON - The food industry on Wednesday overcame objections by state
officials to win House passage of legislation that strips away powers of states
to regulate food.

The bill, long sought by manufacturers, would vest final authority for food
labeling with the Food and Drug Administration. The measure would nullify some
200 state laws governing the safety of meat, fish, milk and a variety of
edibles.

A provision would allow states to appeal to the FDA to preserve their
authorities. But the bill likely would have the effect of limiting a growing

trend by states of warning consumers about chemical threats to what they eat and
drink

"This hodgepodge not only inhibits interstate commerce but it also drives up the
cost for consumers. … Business simply can not absorb these costs," argued Rep.
Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a co-sponsor.

Thirty-nine attorneys general opposed the legislation. They contended in a
letter last week that it would "undercut states’ rights and consumer
protection."

Consumer and environmental advocates also oppose the bill, as do officials from
state agencies regulating agriculture, food and drugs.
Nonetheless, the National Uniformity for Food Act advanced without benefit of
public hearings after the food industry assembled more than half of the members
of the House as co- sponsors. The legislation passed 283-139; it was unclear if
and when the Senate would take up the bill.

"It sounded so good that many members co-sponsored the bill without
understanding that it is going to overturn 200 laws that protect our food
supply," argued Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

"You have to ask yourself, why is this going on. What are they hiding from us?
Why don’t they want this bill to be held up to public scrutiny in hearings?"

Gingrey countered that states have been so aggressive that there soon could be
800 state laws governing food rather than 200, underscoring the need for
uniformity.

Before the bill passed, it was softened with amendments preserving states’
rights to issue warnings about dietary supplements and mercury in fish.

"Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead you.
Find out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to live a
happy life and how to work for a better world." - Linus Pauling

Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health and well
being.

Dawn Worswick
Enhancing the lives of those we touch by helping others reach their goals-
408 294-3293

4 Responses to “House Passes food-labeling bill”

  1. Reed Tamatha Says:

    Wow - that is one seriously concerning piece of news. The trouble with food in
    the US is that we’re screwing up our food supply for the sake of getting cheaper
    food. I do a lot of travelling and food study is kind of a hobby of mine. We
    consume food differently here than in other countries - it just isn’t as healthy
    or as closely connected to the source.

    I’m beginning to think that you have to grow your own food & raise your own
    chickens if you want to know what’s actually in the stuff you’re eating…

    K

    WASHINGTON - The food industry on Wednesday overcame objections by state
    officials to win House passage of legislation that strips away powers of states
    to regulate food.


    The bill, long sought by manufacturers, would vest final authority for food
    labeling with the Food and Drug Administration. The measure would nullify some
    200 state laws governing the safety of meat, fish, milk and a variety of
    edibles.

    A provision would allow states to appeal to the FDA to preserve their
    authorities. But the bill likely would have the effect of limiting a growing
    trend by states of warning consumers about chemical threats to what they eat and
    drink

    "This hodgepodge not only inhibits interstate commerce but it also drives up
    the cost for consumers. … Business simply can not absorb these costs," argued
    Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a co-sponsor.

    Thirty-nine attorneys general opposed the legislation. They contended in a
    letter last week that it would "undercut states’ rights and consumer
    protection."

    Consumer and environmental advocates also oppose the bill, as do officials from
    state agencies regulating agriculture, food and drugs.
    Nonetheless, the National Uniformity for Food Act advanced without benefit of
    public hearings after the food industry assembled more than half of the members
    of the House as co- sponsors. The legislation passed 283-139; it was unclear if
    and when the Senate would take up the bill.

    "It sounded so good that many members co-sponsored the bill without
    understanding that it is going to overturn 200 laws that protect our food
    supply," argued Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

    "You have to ask yourself, why is this going on. What are they hiding from us?
    Why don’t they want this bill to be held up to public scrutiny in hearings?"

    Gingrey countered that states have been so aggressive that there soon could be
    800 state laws governing food rather than 200, underscoring the need for
    uniformity.

    Before the bill passed, it was softened with amendments preserving states’
    rights to issue warnings about dietary supplements and mercury in fish.

    "Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead you.
    Find out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to live a
    happy life and how to work for a better world." - Linus Pauling

    Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health and well
    being.

    Dawn Worswick
    Enhancing the lives of those we touch by helping others reach their goals-
    408 294-3293

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness
    Alternative medicine Health wellness
    product
    Health and wellness program Diet fitness
    health nutrition wellness Health promotion
    and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

  2. Donald Mellissa Says:

    Keith, I agree. And even then, you can never be sure . . . we have neighbors who
    own a chicken farm and unbeknownst to us, they were illegally disposing of dead
    chickens and other by-products of this type of business and the bacteria was
    leaching into the local groundwater until someone called the EPA. It was a mess!
    We were all informed that if we drank well water (we don’t, thank god!) or if we
    grew our own food (we do to some degree), that we needed to have a soil test
    done, etc. I destroyed a lot of very hard work (canned vegetables) out of fear
    and concern. Now, I have a different method of growing my foods, and they are
    well protected from tainted soil. I’m also a former Master Gardener Volunteer
    for our county, and I took this opportunity to put to good use some other
    growing methods that work better for me. I also use a small hot house to grow my
    herbs in so that they are not exposed to airborne contamination. It’s sad when
    you distrust the common food sources with good
    reason, and sadder when you cannot trust your own garden because others are not
    environmentally responsible. I’m no tree hugger, but I’m beginning to think we

    all need to make a large step in that direction! I’ve also read that in
    California, certified organic farmers were furious when neighboring farms
    non-organic corn and other plant material was found to be cross-pollinating
    theirs, thereby tainting it and rendering it non-organic. But what to do? You
    cannot stop the wind from blowing . . .

    I surmise that I am taking as many precautions as I can, and the rest is a
    natural byproduct of my environment that I cannot change readily. It’s just too
    bad that large corporations are not into organics. If we all try to support our
    local farmers more, it might drive the industry in that direction. Rosemary
    Gladstar, reknown herbalist & author, gave the suggestion that "eating with the
    seasons" was an excellent way to tune our bodies to our environment. If we all
    moved in that direction, and stop eating foods force-ripened out of season, it
    could put a dent in the large corp. "bland brand". The local organic farmer
    would once again see an upsurge in demand, and we’d all be a lot healthier.

    But then, you were so right when you say that we just don’t eat that way in
    America. And our kids are paying the price as well as we are.

    Just my thoughts on this subject.
    Karen Howell

    I’m beginning to think that you have to grow your own food & raise your own
    chickens if you want to know what’s actually in the stuff you’re eating…

    K

    WASHINGTON - The food industry on Wednesday overcame objections by state
    officials to win House passage of legislation that strips away powers of states
    to regulate food.

    The bill, long sought by manufacturers, would vest final authority for food
    labeling with the Food and Drug Administration. The measure would nullify some
    200 state laws governing the safety of meat, fish, milk and a variety of
    edibles.

    A provision would allow states to appeal to the FDA to preserve their
    authorities. But the bill likely would have the effect of limiting a growing
    trend by states of warning consumers about chemical threats to what they eat and
    drink

    "This hodgepodge not only inhibits interstate commerce but it also drives up the
    cost for consumers. … Business simply can not absorb these costs," argued Rep.
    Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a co-sponsor.

    Thirty-nine attorneys general opposed the legislation. They contended in a
    letter last week that it would "undercut states’ rights and consumer
    protection."

    Consumer and environmental advocates also oppose the bill, as do officials from
    state agencies regulating agriculture, food and drugs.
    Nonetheless, the National Uniformity for Food Act advanced without benefit of
    public hearings after the food industry assembled more than half of the members
    of the House as co- sponsors. The legislation passed 283-139; it was unclear if
    and when the Senate would take up the bill.

    "It sounded so good that many members co-sponsored the bill without
    understanding that it is going to overturn 200 laws that protect our food
    supply," argued Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

    "You have to ask yourself, why is this going on. What are they hiding from us?
    Why don’t they want this bill to be held up to public scrutiny in hearings?"

    Gingrey countered that states have been so aggressive that there soon could be
    800 state laws governing food rather than 200, underscoring the need for
    uniformity.

    Before the bill passed, it was softened with amendments preserving states’
    rights to issue warnings about dietary supplements and mercury in fish.

    "Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead you.
    Find out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to live a
    happy life and how to work for a better world." - Linus Pauling

    Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health and well
    being.

    Dawn Worswick
    Enhancing the lives of those we touch by helping others reach their goals-
    408 294-3293

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness
    Alternative medicine Health wellness
    product
    Health and wellness program Diet fitness
    health nutrition wellness Health promotion
    and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness Alternative medicine Health wellness product
    Health and wellness program Diet fitness health nutrition wellness Health
    promotion and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

  3. Freddie Skinner Says:

    Karen:

    When you refer to growing a different method now, do you mean your hot
    house? Or is there some other method?

    Thanks,

    Marla

    ——-Original Message——-

    Keith, I agree. And even then, you can never be sure . . . we have neighbors
    who own a chicken farm and unbeknownst to us, they were illegally disposing
    of dead chickens and other by-products of this type of business and the
    bacteria was leaching into the local groundwater until someone called the

    EPA. It was a mess! We were all informed that if we drank well water (we don
    t, thank god!) or if we grew our own food (we do to some degree), that we
    needed to have a soil test done, etc. I destroyed a lot of very hard work
    (canned vegetables) out of fear and concern. Now, I have a different method
    of growing my foods, and they are well protected from tainted soil. I’m also
    a former Master Gardener Volunteer for our county, and I took this
    opportunity to put to good use some other growing methods that work better
    for me. I also use a small hot house to grow my herbs in so that they are
    not exposed to airborne contamination. It’s sad when you distrust the common
    food sources with good
    reason, and sadder when you cannot trust your own garden because others
    are not environmentally responsible. I’m no tree hugger, but I’m beginning
    to think we all need to make a large step in that direction! I’ve also read
    that in California, certified organic farmers were furious when neighboring
    farms non-organic corn and other plant material was found to be
    cross-pollinating theirs, thereby tainting it and rendering it non-organic.
    But what to do? You cannot stop the wind from blowing . . .

    I surmise that I am taking as many precautions as I can, and the rest is a
    natural byproduct of my environment that I cannot change readily. It’s just
    too bad that large corporations are not into organics. If we all try to
    support our local farmers more, it might drive the industry in that
    direction. Rosemary Gladstar, reknown herbalist & author, gave the
    suggestion that "eating with the seasons" was an excellent way to tune our
    bodies to our environment. If we all moved in that direction, and stop
    eating foods force-ripened out of season, it could put a dent in the large
    corp. "bland brand". The local organic farmer would once again see an
    upsurge in demand, and we’d all be a lot healthier.

    But then, you were so right when you say that we just don’t eat that way
    in America. And our kids are paying the price as well as we are.

    Just my thoughts on this subject.
    Karen Howell

    I’m beginning to think that you have to grow your own food & raise your own
    chickens if you want to know what’s actually in the stuff you’re eating…

    K

    WASHINGTON - The food industry on Wednesday overcame objections by state
    officials to win House passage of legislation that strips away powers of
    states to regulate food.

    The bill, long sought by manufacturers, would vest final authority for food
    labeling with the Food and Drug Administration. The measure would nullify
    some 200 state laws governing the safety of meat, fish, milk and a variety
    of edibles.

    A provision would allow states to appeal to the FDA to preserve their
    authorities. But the bill likely would have the effect of limiting a growing
    trend by states of warning consumers about chemical threats to what they eat
    and drink

    "This hodgepodge not only inhibits interstate commerce but it also drives up
    the cost for consumers. … Business simply can not absorb these costs,"
    argued Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a co-sponsor.

    Thirty-nine attorneys general opposed the legislation. They contended in a
    letter last week that it would "undercut states’ rights and consumer
    protection."

    Consumer and environmental advocates also oppose the bill, as do officials
    from state agencies regulating agriculture, food and drugs.
    Nonetheless, the National Uniformity for Food Act advanced without benefit
    of public hearings after the food industry assembled more than half of the
    members of the House as co- sponsors. The legislation passed 283-139; it was
    unclear if and when the Senate would take up the bill.

    "It sounded so good that many members co-sponsored the bill without
    understanding that it is going to overturn 200 laws that protect our food
    supply," argued Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

    "You have to ask yourself, why is this going on. What are they hiding from
    us? Why don’t they want this bill to be held up to public scrutiny in
    hearings?"

    Gingrey countered that states have been so aggressive that there soon could
    be 800 state laws governing food rather than 200, underscoring the need for
    uniformity.

    Before the bill passed, it was softened with amendments preserving states’
    rights to issue warnings about dietary supplements and mercury in fish.

    "Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead
    you. Find out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to
    live a happy life and how to work for a better world." - Linus Pauling

    Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health and
    well being.

    Dawn Worswick
    Enhancing the lives of those we touch by helping others reach their
    goals-
    408 294-3293

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness
    Alternative medicine
    Health wellness product
    Health and wellness program
    Diet fitness health nutrition wellness
    Health promotion and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness Alternative medicine Health wellness product
    Health and wellness program Diet fitness health nutrition wellness
    Health promotion and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

  4. Susan Anneliese Says:

    We have a "Farmers Market" in our community on Saturdays in the summer and
    the Vegetables and fruit there are a million times better than Grocery Store
    Purchased food. If you live in a suburb you probably have one also.

    Alison

    Keith, I agree. And even then, you can never be sure . . . we have neighbors
    who own a chicken farm and unbeknownst to us, they were illegally disposing
    of dead chickens and other by-products of this type of business and the
    bacteria was leaching into the local groundwater until someone called the
    EPA. It was a mess! We were all informed that if we drank well water (we
    don’t, thank god!) or if we grew our own food (we do to some degree), that
    we needed to have a soil test done, etc. I destroyed a lot of very hard work
    (canned vegetables) out of fear and concern. Now, I have a different method
    of growing my foods, and they are well protected from tainted soil. I’m also

    a former Master Gardener Volunteer for our county, and I took this
    opportunity to put to good use some other growing methods that work better
    for me. I also use a small hot house to grow my herbs in so that they are
    not exposed to airborne contamination. It’s sad when you distrust the common
    food sources with good
    reason, and sadder when you cannot trust your own garden because others are
    not environmentally responsible. I’m no tree hugger, but I’m beginning to
    think we all need to make a large step in that direction! I’ve also read
    that in California, certified organic farmers were furious when neighboring
    farms non-organic corn and other plant material was found to be
    cross-pollinating theirs, thereby tainting it and rendering it non-organic.
    But what to do? You cannot stop the wind from blowing . . .

    I surmise that I am taking as many precautions as I can, and the rest is a
    natural byproduct of my environment that I cannot change readily. It’s just
    too bad that large corporations are not into organics. If we all try to
    support our local farmers more, it might drive the industry in that
    direction. Rosemary Gladstar, reknown herbalist & author, gave the
    suggestion that "eating with the seasons" was an excellent way to tune our
    bodies to our environment. If we all moved in that direction, and stop
    eating foods force-ripened out of season, it could put a dent in the large
    corp. "bland brand". The local organic farmer would once again see an
    upsurge in demand, and we’d all be a lot healthier.

    But then, you were so right when you say that we just don’t eat that way
    in America. And our kids are paying the price as well as we are.

    Just my thoughts on this subject.
    Karen Howell

    I’m beginning to think that you have to grow your own food & raise your own
    chickens if you want to know what’s actually in the stuff you’re eating…

    K

    WASHINGTON - The food industry on Wednesday overcame objections by state
    officials to win House passage of legislation that strips away powers of
    states to regulate food.

    The bill, long sought by manufacturers, would vest final authority for food
    labeling with the Food and Drug Administration. The measure would nullify
    some 200 state laws governing the safety of meat, fish, milk and a variety
    of edibles.

    A provision would allow states to appeal to the FDA to preserve their
    authorities. But the bill likely would have the effect of limiting a growing
    trend by states of warning consumers about chemical threats to what they eat
    and drink

    "This hodgepodge not only inhibits interstate commerce but it also drives up
    the cost for consumers. … Business simply can not absorb these costs,"
    argued Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a co-sponsor.

    Thirty-nine attorneys general opposed the legislation. They contended in a
    letter last week that it would "undercut states’ rights and consumer
    protection."

    Consumer and environmental advocates also oppose the bill, as do officials
    from state agencies regulating agriculture, food and drugs.
    Nonetheless, the National Uniformity for Food Act advanced without benefit
    of public hearings after the food industry assembled more than half of the
    members of the House as co- sponsors. The legislation passed 283-139; it was
    unclear if and when the Senate would take up the bill.

    "It sounded so good that many members co-sponsored the bill without
    understanding that it is going to overturn 200 laws that protect our food
    supply," argued Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

    "You have to ask yourself, why is this going on. What are they hiding from
    us? Why don’t they want this bill to be held up to public scrutiny in
    hearings?"

    Gingrey countered that states have been so aggressive that there soon could
    be 800 state laws governing food rather than 200, underscoring the need for
    uniformity.

    Before the bill passed, it was softened with amendments preserving states’
    rights to issue warnings about dietary supplements and mercury in fish.

    "Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead
    you. Find out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to
    live a happy life and how to work for a better world." - Linus Pauling

    Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health and
    well being.

    Dawn Worswick
    Enhancing the lives of those we touch by helping others reach their
    goals-
    408 294-3293

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness
    Alternative medicine Health wellness
    product
    Health and wellness program Diet
    fitness health nutrition wellness
    Health promotion and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Health and wellness Alternative medicine Health wellness product
    Health and wellness program Diet fitness health nutrition wellness
    Health promotion and wellness

    Visit your group "eczemapsoriasis" on the web.

    ———————————

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.